Here's the theme song for this entry:
There's been so much talk recently about birth control and Rush Limbaugh's remarks and so forth. There are also a whole new slate of state laws aimed at persecuting women, such as in Texas where they're requiring women to get a vaginal ultrasound before you can get an abortion. Another proposed law in Georgia would require a woman to carry a baby to full term even if that baby is already stillborn, ie dead. The doofus proposing the law's rationale is that's what we do with cows and pigs, so it's good enough for humans. Which makes me think women in that guy's district should be really upset that he thinks they're equal to livestock.
If you'll excuse an "I told you so" from this liberal, this is what happens when you let the inmates run the asylum. I mean this is the same party that started a needless war with its fear-mongering and won a presidential election the next year with more fear-mongering. It's also the same party where it's perfectly acceptable to challenge the citizenship of the president and even if proof comes forward to continue saying he's not American and a "secret Muslim." It's the same people who screamed about "death panels". So really people, what the hell did you expect?
And now that they're mostly done with persecuting illegal aliens and gays, they need to find a new issue to use as an excuse to take away more of people's freedom. Sorry ladies, but it's your turn now. Which makes me glad I'm a white male. And nearly a middle-aged white male. If I had an IQ of less than 100 I'd be right in their target demographic!
Anyway, the point here is that they've always got to find some way to keep people divided. They need something to whip people up about. Especially someone like Santorum since Romney is the economy candidate and it lets him show that he's the more conservative (ie crazy) candidate.
If all this weren't real life, it'd be kind of funny how the Catholics start complaining about this birth control thing and then Santorum and Rush and Rick Perry and all the sleazy GOP group have to jump on board and see who can prove he hates women the most. "I'll take away their birth control!" "Yeah well I'll call them sluts and prostitutes!" "Oh yeah, I'll make them have to get a probe shoved up their vag if they want an abortion!" "I got you all beat, I'll make them carry dead babies to term!" It's really been a game of hate-mongering oneupsmanship.
And in large part I think a lot of it is because there's not enough out there to excite the Evangelical types and the other wackos making up the GOP "base." I mean other than there's a black guy in the White House who isn't serving drinks or opening doors for people. Really this field of candidates is pretty pitiful. Do you want the guy who hasn't been a governor in six years? The guy who hasn't been a senator for six years? Or the guy who hasn't been in Congress in thirteen years? And they have the charisma and charm to go with those resumes. So really, how else can you get people excited? Find a scapegoat! Then the birth control thing just happened to fall in their laps and it was on.
But it's really not surprising because politics is always a game of divide and conquer, especially these days. We have to attach labels to everything: liberal or conservative, right or left, black or white, and so forth. We have to exploit people's natural prejudices about race, gender, sexual orientation, and religion. This was described brilliantly in the classic Twilight Zone episode "The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street" where aliens mess with the power grid to turn a neighborhood's people against each other. At the end one alien marvels at how easily it is to get the whole neighborhood into a riot. All you have to do is turn a few lights on and off, make a few cars turn on at the right time, and people fill in the rest with their prejudices.
Maybe it's not an alien conspiracy but politicians, religions, and even advertisers have done a great job of keeping us from achieving any real cohesion. When I mention advertisers, I mean how they make us think in terms of "cool" and "uncool" and so forth. It's just another way to help us discriminate against each other.
I would really like people to stand up and tell their leaders that we don't want to go back to the Dark Ages. Because we're never going to move forward by moving backwards. Stripping one group after another of basic freedoms is only going to keep us from accomplishing anything. Ignoring our prejudices and working together we can achieve much more; we could make this a real paradise for everyone, not just old white guys with money.
BTW, if you want to read a great rant about the women's issue and why many "liberals" aren't standing up for women, check this out.
Thanks Muttley. I appreciate your support.
ReplyDeleteWell, as a queer woman, I'm just glad they're finally coming out and saying that they think I'm a broken slutty cow. Makes building evidence so much easier.
ReplyDeleteOn one hand I feel fairly good that Obama is going to be reelected since the GOPs are falling all over themselves to appeal to the far right, that even the middle-roaders (like my mother) will probably vote for Obama again. But on the other you are right, this is not helping us build cohesion or moving forward with our society at all.
The Republicans have been using the poor economy, which they orchestrated, to create a phony financial crisis. They are using this crisis to undo fifty years of what they call "entitlement programs." The Republicans have always detested these programs and are attempting to undo the will of the people so they can hand over this money to the rich, who hold the leash on the republican Party.
ReplyDeleteI'm proud of you - that line about working together at the end was nice. It almost makes me think there could be hope.
ReplyDeleteI find the Republican party to pretty much be appalling. I'm horrified that people are listening to them, and they actually scare me. If Rick Santorum for any reason became president of our nation, I think I would have to move to another country. Did you catch the bible banger on t.v. the other day that said, "If you don't think like us...get the hell out of our country!"
ReplyDeleteI foresee the country actually becoming more polarized. On my side will be the democrats, the liberals, the gays, and the atheists...people with critical thinking skills. On the other will be the evangelicals trying to rouse all other religions to their cause. They will try to force creationism down our throats, re-enslave black people, crush civil rights for anyone who is not a straight anglo-saxon MALE, and try to restore their idyllic men to a place of absolute power.
I read that link rant and wasn't sure I understood the point; it was kind of rambling and I'm not sure what the gist of it was.
ReplyDeleteI get that there's a war on women; in part, there's a war on everything that scares the right, which is sad, as I used to be the right but then the right moved and now I'm the middle. (Also, a little communist, but that's because I started thinking.)
The Republican party right now is made up of a weird mixture of racists, economic opportunists, and neocons. The New Yorker this week had a great article on how that came to be and the mixture of highly motivated factions and free-spending SuperPACS (which I'm all for even though they are free-spending causes that I hate) is propelling the current primary season.
What's reassuring is that Santorum doesn't command even a respectable minority of Republicans. What's disheartening is that in a general election, even Santorum has a great chance of winning.
But back to the War on Women: The Republicans are, as they do so often, picking at low-hanging fruit. In Wisconsin, they demonized public unions and school teachers to get budget cuts through, and people like my in-laws said "Yeah, well, those government workers are overpaid and lazy" because when people think "government worker" they think some DMV person who gave them a bad time about renewing their license, not janitors and road plow operators. And people have consistently underrated school teachers' job difficulties and value. We love paying $100,000,000 to St. Peyton Manning because he can throw a football and we can't, but we figure that we could teach our kids history if we had to so why pay teachers to take summers off?
Now, they're going after "women who want abortions." As someone who despises abortion, I can see the sympathy there -- but if I were given the power to make a rule, I wouldn't outlaw abortions, I'd help promote a society where they're increasingly unnecessary (greater access to birth control and sex ed, more adoption resources, etc.)
But that's me. Sticking up for "women who want abortions" is tough to do and most liberals won't try very hard, including Obama and many others, who I haven't heard say much about these issues.
I could say more but I bet I'm at my word limit. I second all your points, though.
The scape goating of religion bothers me. So does the fact that people take advantage of religion to further non-religious means. Like the Crusades so that the rich, land owners could steal more land. Especially the Catholic church. But that's not religion doing that; it's people -using- religion, taking advantage of it, to further secular ambitions.
ReplyDeleteThe Republicans are today where the Democrats were back in the 70 and early 80's....on the extreme fringe of their party. And such a position will NOT get you elected. Politics has become so viscous no decent candidate wants to come forward, leaving us with these yo-yo's we don't want. But I'm an optimist....I think cooler heads and reason will ultimately prevail.
ReplyDeleteS
Lets counter these guys with a ban on Viagra.
ReplyDelete.......dhole
I heard that in one state at least a female member of the legislature proposed a pill to do something like that. Which I fully support. If women can't get contraceptive then old guys can't get help getting it up. Seems fair enough.
DeleteI usually don't post political comments, but you seem to be level-headed, so perhaps just this once.
ReplyDeleteSince Romney is a liberal (running as a Republican), would you vote for him?
Also, politics these days seems to born of extremes in both parties, with few so-called leaders straddling the middle ground. It makes me glad I am overseas for the time being.